Silicondust LPTV
-
allen98311
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 1:34 am
- Device ID: 10802E84 10190FE2
- Location: Port Orchard, WA
- x 9
Re: Silicondust LPTV
Seattle would be cool, but there are a lot of stations already.
Re: Silicondust LPTV
Our pending Wichita KS license poses an interesting problem... do we ATSC 1.0 or ATSC 3.0?
Re: Silicondust LPTV
Is that set in stone as part of the paperwork, or can you change with sufficient notice? Despite the long-term uncertainty of 3.0, there certainly aren't many 3.0 LPTV stations around.nickk wrote: Sun May 24, 2026 8:18 am Our pending Wichita KS license poses an interesting problem... do we ATSC 1.0 or ATSC 3.0?
Re: Silicondust LPTV
It requires filing paperwork but we can switch the station between the two standards.Cabal wrote: Sun May 24, 2026 9:43 amIs that set in stone as part of the paperwork, or can you change with sufficient notice? Despite the long-term uncertainty of 3.0, there certainly aren't many 3.0 LPTV stations around.nickk wrote: Sun May 24, 2026 8:18 am Our pending Wichita KS license poses an interesting problem... do we ATSC 1.0 or ATSC 3.0?
-
howardc1243
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2022 4:50 am
- Device ID: scribe 4k 15402ABF
- x 30
Re: Silicondust LPTV
oh nickk, if you don't use DRM you can avoid having to deal with that crappy a3sa.nickk wrote: Sun May 24, 2026 9:59 amIt requires filing paperwork but we can switch the station between the two standards.Cabal wrote: Sun May 24, 2026 9:43 amIs that set in stone as part of the paperwork, or can you change with sufficient notice? Despite the long-term uncertainty of 3.0, there certainly aren't many 3.0 LPTV stations around.nickk wrote: Sun May 24, 2026 8:18 am Our pending Wichita KS license poses an interesting problem... do we ATSC 1.0 or ATSC 3.0?