Encryption

ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV Forum
Post Reply
NatHillIV
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:43 am
x 34

Re: Encryption

Post by NatHillIV »

In my eyes, Nick offered some very encouraging news regarding DRM I obtained while watching a Lon Seidman's youtube post.

quote:
https://postimg.cc/vx4YYjGh

Seidman video:
https://youtu.be/IzLjhBF30XQ

Mods: If I've posted something you don't like, feel free to delete it. I don't want to rock the apple cart.

DrSmith
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 6:56 am
x 26

Re: Encryption

Post by DrSmith »

NatHillIV wrote: Tue Jan 13, 2026 9:39 am In my eyes, Nick offered some very encouraging news regarding DRM I obtained while watching a Lon Seidman's youtube post.
I must be missing something. I don't see any news here. Just unbounded optimism, which SiliconDust has had since DRM was first turned on. I do hope 2026 is the year we get gateways going on ATSC 3.0. But I don't have any more optimism than I did in 2023 at this point.

Cabal
Posts: 313
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:53 pm
x 68

Re: Encryption

Post by Cabal »

It would be a nice step, but iOS devices, Macs, and Windows would still be left out in the cold, though.

jasonl
Silicondust
Posts: 17633
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:23 pm
x 112

Re: Encryption

Post by jasonl »

We don't consider any solution that won't support iOS and Windows to be a complete solution and that will be part of our communications with the FCC and others. Macs, we'll see, depends on other factors at the OS level.

danieljlevine
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2023 8:26 pm
x 18

Re: Encryption

Post by danieljlevine »

I believe this is the quote in the article being referred to here:

And while SiliconDust’s HDHomeRun networked tuner remains unable to access encrypted ATSC 3.0 channels, there are signs of progress on that front, too. SiliconDust announced in November 2025 that it had become an ATSC 3.0 Certificate Authority for NextGen TV, and the company had a demo stall at the modest ATSC booth at CES for the first time.

Pearl TV has previously said that HDHomeRun was ineligible for DRM certification because it uses a chip from a subsidiary of Huawei, which the FCC has deemed a security threat. In an interview at CES, SiliconDust CTO and founder Nick Kelsey said the chip isn’t relevant to handling encrypted channels, and that HDHomeRun doesn’t even do the decryption itself. (Instead, it passes the video along to streaming devices, such as a Fire TV or Android TV, to handle the decryption.)

Kelsey said the allegations were “weird,” as the company had a great working relationship with Pearl previously, but added that those relations have since gone back to normal. He’s now hoping that HDHomeRun devices will support encrypted ATSC 3.0 channels this year without any additional hardware.

It’s not something that’s going to drag on further, and that’s not just us. Everyone in the industry is of a similar opinion,” he said.

These developments won’t allay every concern about ATSC 3.0. Gateway devices still require an internet connection for DRM, and out-of-home viewing won’t be possible. It also remains unclear if tuners will be able to work with third-party DVR software, such as Plex and Channels. For those reasons, ATSC 3.0 might remain toxic among tech enthusiasts even as the DVR options improve.

tzr916
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:47 pm
x 1

Re: Encryption

Post by tzr916 »

danieljlevine wrote: Wed Jan 14, 2026 8:02 pm ...It also remains unclear if tuners will be able to work with third-party DVR software, such as Plex and Channels. For those reasons, ATSC 3.0 might remain toxic among tech enthusiasts even as the DVR options improve.
Unclear? The ONLY "third party" dvr software that handled DRM was Windows Media Center. If DRM survives, ATSC 3.0 on the PC is a dead duck (aside from possibly the Windows native HDHR App).

Post Reply