Encryption

ATSC 3.0 Forum
Post Reply
Freekick123
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2020 7:23 am
x 21

Re: Encryption

Post by Freekick123 »

I think Silicon Dust needs to hit every office at the FCC in person, with a meeting like the AWARN guy did.
Top
nickk
Silicondust
Posts: 20753
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:39 am
x 345

Re: Encryption

Post by nickk »

Freekick123 wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:38 pm I think Silicon Dust needs to hit every office at the FCC in person, with a meeting like the AWARN guy did.
Currently in Washington DC, had a good meeting with the team at FCC HQ...
Top
NatHillIV
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:43 am
x 22

Re: Encryption

Post by NatHillIV »

Dxcv wrote: Tue Jul 29, 2025 8:53 am
techpro2004 wrote: Tue Jul 29, 2025 7:44 am Again I ask which is easier/cheaper a redesign or being dragged through the muck.
Because, the chip they use doesn't matter ultimately. They are just going to complain about something else and move the goalposts. Pearl's assertions are wrong and they are trying to play it up to force a ATSC 3.0 deadline and ultimately hurt consumers.
Please explain how getting in a big fight with the producer of the best selling ATSC 3.0 device is in any way helpful in "forcing an ATSC 3.0 deadline" ❓❓
Top
Post Reply

Return to “ATSC 3.0 Forum”