New FCC filing by Silicondust

ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV Forum
Post Reply
nickk
Silicondust
Posts: 21041
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:39 am
x 395

New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by nickk »


Cabal
Posts: 334
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:53 pm
x 77

Re: New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by Cabal »

Fighting the good fight.

lenlab
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2023 6:00 am
x 10

Re: New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by lenlab »

Well done document. If only the FCC would be able to read and understand the implications laid out. I'm hoping they do!

cncb
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:56 pm
x 3

Re: New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by cncb »

Have they ever responded to any of your letters? I hope this is not all wasted effort.

NatHillIV
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:43 am
x 42

Re: New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by NatHillIV »

Keep up the good fight Nick. I have a 4K tuner of yours that is getting ready to go to work on ALL ATSC 3.0 stations. :D

sdust
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2021 3:39 am
x 3

Re: New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by sdust »

It might have been a good time to point out lack of familiarity with the OSI model by ATSC 3.0 proponents.

jasonl
Silicondust
Posts: 17747
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:23 pm
x 104

Re: New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by jasonl »

lenlab wrote: Wed Apr 29, 2026 5:19 am Well done document. If only the FCC would be able to read and understand the implications laid out. I'm hoping they do!
I can guarantee you that people at the FCC read everything that gets filed and there are subject matter experts across the entire range of things they need to deal with from engineering to law. If there is something they need additional information on, they will arrange to get it.

sdust
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2021 3:39 am
x 3

Re: New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by sdust »

jasonl wrote: Wed Apr 29, 2026 6:15 pm I can guarantee you that people at the FCC read everything that gets filed and there are subject matter experts across the entire range of things they need to deal with from engineering to law. If there is something they need additional information on, they will arrange to get it.
If this were the case, we wouldn't be talking about ATSC 3.0. It is a solution in search of a problem.

jasonl
Silicondust
Posts: 17747
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:23 pm
x 104

Re: New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by jasonl »

The problems are that MPEG2 and AC3 are horribly outdated and inefficient and 8VSB gets destroyed by multipath. ATSC 3.0 solves all of these problems. It just has other problems, some that the FCC can do something about (DRM) and some that it can't (high cost of licensing, uncertainty surrounding patents that aren't part of the licensing pools). Also, generally, the broadcasters who want this have done nothing to sell the general public on why they should care. HDTV was an easy sell for 1.0, but marginally better quality HDTV and marginally better reception isn't moving the needle outside of the early adopter community.

sdust
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2021 3:39 am
x 3

Re: New FCC filing by Silicondust

Post by sdust »

The problem is ATSC holding back modern codecs on ATSC 1.0 for the purpose of selling us ATSC 3.0.
Is seems they've never heard of the OSI model.

Post Reply