Search found 22 matches

by Trip
Fri Apr 16, 2021 5:57 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: Washington, DC / Baltimore, MD
Replies: 17
Views: 1366

Re: ATSC 3.0: Washington, DC / Baltimore, MD

FCC rules require that horizontal power exceed vertical. The best they could do is to go circular with it. Perhaps they're testing the worst case--trying to do mobile from an H-only antenna. If you happen to get over to look at it, I'd be extremely interested to find out what you see. I assume at le...
by Trip
Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:12 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Updated hdhomerun_config software for linux?
Replies: 7
Views: 593

Re: Updated hdhomerun_config software for linux?

NedS wrote: Mon Apr 05, 2021 6:57 pm Odd, will inquire with the boss and see what's up. The zip files are generated by the build script, so it might be something that hasn't actually been updated since then, but a fresh zip file gets generated each time. I'll see what I can find out.
Any word? I appreciate it.

- Trip
by Trip
Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:39 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Updated hdhomerun_config software for linux?
Replies: 7
Views: 593

Re: Updated hdhomerun_config software for linux?

I'd much rather see them dump the computer-based app entirely and put all of the functionality on the device's web page where it belongs. Make it accessible on tablets and phones so we can adjust our attic and rooftop antennas without having to lug a laptop around. Probably less dev work to rewrite...
by Trip
Fri Apr 02, 2021 2:24 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Updated hdhomerun_config software for linux?
Replies: 7
Views: 593

Re: Updated hdhomerun_config software for linux?

The page probably hasn't been updated yet on the main site, but you can also find the links here: https://info.hdhomerun.com/info/linux#configuration_utility Unfortunately, the hdhomerun_config_gui zip file indicates that all the files inside are dated 2016, so the version number doesn't correspond...
by Trip
Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:57 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: Washington, DC / Baltimore, MD
Replies: 17
Views: 1366

Re: ATSC 3.0: Washington, DC / Baltimore, MD

WIAV-CD just changed its modcod to QPSK and 7/15 FEC, so the minimum SNR is now around 4 Mbps. They've cut the bitrate on their video down to the 3-3.5 Mbps range. I wish plpinfo (or a more detailed version of it) could spit out some of the other parameters, like the LDPC, FFT, Guard Interval, etc. ...
by Trip
Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:56 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: Syracuse, NY
Replies: 6
Views: 483

Re: ATSC 3.0: Syracuse, NY

No worries, and thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for. :)

- Trip
by Trip
Fri Mar 26, 2021 2:34 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: Syracuse, NY
Replies: 6
Views: 483

Re: ATSC 3.0: Syracuse, NY

dustbot wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:35 pm 0 is locked for 103.1
1 is locked for 105.1
2 is locked for 109.1
Can you tell me, when looking at the HDHR GUI, what the number is to the left of each channel? I suspect it's like 5001 for 3-1, for example.

- Trip
by Trip
Thu Mar 25, 2021 11:39 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: Washington, DC / Baltimore, MD
Replies: 17
Views: 1366

Re: ATSC 3.0: Washington, DC / Baltimore, MD

By digging into the manifest.xml file, I think I have determined that the video is actually 1080p. <Representation bandwidth="7500000" codecs="hvc1.2.4.L123.11" frameRate="60000/1001" height="1080" id="Video1_1" sar="1:1" scanType="Progressive" width="1920"> A user on AVS reports the Stirr app is pr...
by Trip
Thu Mar 25, 2021 8:59 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: Washington, DC / Baltimore, MD
Replies: 17
Views: 1366

Re: ATSC 3.0: Washington, DC / Baltimore, MD

Now seeing it here in Alexandria. Just the one channel in (I assume) 1080i. Bitrate about 8 Mbps.

trip@trip-G752VY:~$ hdhomerun_config 10805D4A get /tuner0/plpinfo
0: sfi=0 mod=qam16 cod=9/15 layer=core ti=cti lls=1 lock=1

- Trip
by Trip
Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:25 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: San Jose
Replies: 0
Views: 374

ATSC 3.0: San Jose

Anyone seeing KBKF-LD 6 in San Jose in 3.0?

- Trip
by Trip
Fri Feb 12, 2021 6:44 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: Raleigh/Durham - Jan 2021
Replies: 74
Views: 7034

Re: ATSC 3.0: Raleigh/Durham - Jan 2021

I hope I didn't offend you Trip. That wasn't my intent – just trying to state some facts on the local OTA situation here in RDU. By no means do I expect you to be able to cover every station in every market. Your site is very helpful, and I hope you are able to continue the great work. If you need ...
by Trip
Thu Feb 11, 2021 7:28 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: Raleigh/Durham - Jan 2021
Replies: 74
Views: 7034

Re: ATSC 3.0: Raleigh/Durham - Jan 2021

And yes, Rabbit Ears and other sites are quite far behind. I know quite a lot of even ATSC 1.0 channels in these databases are ancient by many standards. I have seen reports on some channels that haven't been updated since those channels launched by themselves as the only channel on their frequency...
by Trip
Fri Jan 29, 2021 2:21 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ATSC 3.0: Raleigh/Durham - Jan 2021
Replies: 74
Views: 7034

Re: ATSC 3.0: Raleigh/Durham - Jan 2021

Could they have changed the settings on PLP1 such that it now requires a higher threshold to decode?

- Trip
by Trip
Fri Jan 08, 2021 7:02 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ASTC 3.0 Columbus, Ohio - Jan 2021
Replies: 56
Views: 5839

Re: ASTC 3.0 Columbus, Ohio

jbinkley60 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 6:52 pm Jeff
Thanks!

- Trip
by Trip
Fri Jan 08, 2021 6:03 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: ASTC 3.0 Columbus, Ohio - Jan 2021
Replies: 56
Views: 5839

Re: ASTC 3.0 Columbus, Ohio

Not sure what Trip would like with it now adding of 100 to the channel numbers but think that is understood now. And if there are multiple physical channels it would probably be best to group them that way. Thanks for the alternative method; that's really helpful. The primary key in the RabbitEars ...