Our response sent to the FCC:

https://download.silicondust.com/docs/Silicondust%20Response%20to%20Pearl%20Ex%20Parte%20Letter%20(7-22-25).pdf


Thanks for sharing this Nick. It's very well written and covers the important points. We can certainly see in this filing the "update" we've all been ...

…
If they came out with, say ATSC 1.1 instead of 3.0, with the only difference being that h.265 is now a mandatory for hardware and broadcasting, I would be on board with that.


If they just did away with DRM from ATSC 3.0 and the ability to delete and/or restrict DVR playback, ATSC 3.0 is a ...

The FCC has posted a document that seeks comment on the NAB proposal to sunset ATSC 1.0.

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-314A1.pdf

From the document:

"Also, the Commission has received thousands of consumer comments objecting to broadcasters employing the use of Digital Rights ...