Search found 84 matches
- Wed Aug 05, 2026 10:48 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 901
- Views: 13770607
Re: Encryption
They are killing OTA so it will all be streaming. Look at NBC with Peacock and CBS with Paramount +.
inserted by: howardc1243 at 01:43 am pay close attention to these time periods when comparing the differences between the local broadcasters and the streaming service 4:30am to 7:00am, 9 ...
- Wed Aug 05, 2026 10:16 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 901
- Views: 13770607
Re: Encryption
the a3sa may have the blessing of the pearl group...
Have the blessing of? They're essentially the same thing.
that is where JefferMC the collusion comes in many of those smucks that set on the board of the pearl group are involved with the a3sa and are very biased in their handling of the ...
- Fri Jul 31, 2026 6:15 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 901
- Views: 13770607
Re: Encryption
I've got a hunch the fcc is about to drop a bombshell on the broadcasters with regards to encryption.
What makes you think that after all this time?
the amount of time that has passed since the public comment and the subsequent responses from the parties involved for and against.
and with ...
- Wed Jul 29, 2026 4:12 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 901
- Views: 13770607
Re: Encryption
They are killing OTA so it will all be streaming. Look at NBC with Peacock and CBS with Paramount +.
That's not going to help the actual broadcasters. On the contrary, that will cut them out completely. Although networks do own some stations, most are owned by the tv mafia of Nexstar, Tegna ...
- Sun Jul 19, 2026 9:26 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Unable to play channel: No Video Data
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6574
Re: Unable to play channel: No Video Data
No symbol quality on ATSC 3.0 when signal quality is good means there's no data coming in, which either means there just isn't anything being broadcast at the time or there's something about the way the broadcast is configured that means the HDHomeRun isn't finding the data. I would probably lean ...
- Wed Jul 08, 2026 5:32 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Silicondust FCC meet (June 2 2026)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4562
Re: Silicondust FCC meet (June 2 2026)
the more facts the fcc has, the more likely silicondust will knock the broadcasters on their ass.
- Mon Jun 22, 2026 11:58 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: SiliconDust - ATSC 3.0
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16260
Re: SiliconDust - ATSC 3.0
[removed by moderator]
- Wed Jun 03, 2026 10:54 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Silicondust LPTV
- Replies: 34
- Views: 43732
Re: Silicondust LPTV
Our pending Wichita KS license poses an interesting problem... do we ATSC 1.0 or ATSC 3.0?
Is that set in stone as part of the paperwork, or can you change with sufficient notice? Despite the long-term uncertainty of 3.0, there certainly aren't many 3.0 LPTV stations around.
It requires ...
- Thu May 21, 2026 4:45 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Silicondust LPTV
- Replies: 34
- Views: 43732
Re: Silicondust LPTV
any idea nick, of what channels you plan to carry on the silicondust LPTV network if I can mention it.nickk wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 3:57 pm Our application for CH20 in Wichita just got assigned a call sign! K20PL-D
- Sat Mar 28, 2026 10:04 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Silicondust LPTV
- Replies: 34
- Views: 43732
Re: Silicondust LPTV
What does this mean to a consumer?
It won't have much of a direct impact, but it gives Silicondust another seat at the "table" to also be a broadcaster. It also gives us valuable experience that will help the HDHomeRun-side of things (special testing, trying ATSC 3.0 features that other ...
- Sun Mar 01, 2026 2:57 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 901
- Views: 13770607
Re: Encryption
If a network decided to do an encrypted channel that required people to buy a converter box to view, that is not considered broadcasting under FCC policy. There is no ambiguity.
If all 4 networks decide to encrypt their primary channels, informing TV manufacturers that they have to build the ...
- Sun Feb 01, 2026 12:11 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 901
- Views: 13770607
Re: Encryption
...It also remains unclear if tuners will be able to work with third-party DVR software, such as Plex and Channels. For those reasons, ATSC 3.0 might remain toxic among tech enthusiasts even as the DVR options improve.
Unclear? The ONLY "third party" dvr software that handled DRM was Windows ...
- Wed Nov 19, 2025 6:03 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: T2, PBTV, GMLOOP, and ROXi Internet Channels
- Replies: 29
- Views: 158030
Re: T2, PBTV, GMLOOP, and ROXi Internet Channels
I'll reiterate that, for me, this functionality isn't high on my list of desired features. Now, if DRM was removed from some of the IP channels in my area that would change overnight.
I'll also echo what the previous posters suggested above - if there's a way to allow the user to opt-in I think ...
- Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:57 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 901
- Views: 13770607
Re: Encryption
according to the last video uploaded to you-tube lon seidman revealed some good news regarding drm and the broadcasters, nab, pearl and the a3sa are going to have to answer some hard questions from the fcc with regard to encryption among other things.
- Sat Sep 06, 2025 4:18 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Nextgen TV
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 901
- Views: 13770607
Re: Encryption
looks like that roadhazard is looking for a wreck.joblo wrote: Wed Sep 03, 2025 12:43 amSteady as she goes... https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-789A1.pdf
anyone been stockpiling movies or tv progs?