I agree.
Search found 10 matches
- Thu Sep 19, 2024 5:54 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 670
- Views: 976768
Re: Encryption
- Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:03 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 670
- Views: 976768
Re: What will it look like?
If the powers that be approve SD decryption, I suspect the requirements will be to refuse skipping or fast forwarding content (the commercials will need to be included just like the streaming apps) and anyone using HDHomeRUN ATSC 3 decrypted streams must also abide by the rules. Correct?
Mon ...
- Fri Aug 23, 2024 7:33 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 670
- Views: 976768
Re: Encryption
[withdrawn by author]
- Wed May 01, 2024 10:48 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 670
- Views: 976768
Re: Encryption
Which broadcasters are on the A3SA voting committee?nickk wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 10:40 am every new feature an innovator wants to add to a consumer product needs to be approved by the broadcasters that are on the A3SA voting committee.
- Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:32 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 670
- Views: 976768
Re: Encryption
according to [an SD competitor] 15.1 and 61.1 in phoenix (115.1/161.1 for SD's tuners) [...] are marked in a way that either offline mode is required (something a gateway will probably never have, but tv's can do but don't always use when connected) or interactive apps must be supported... since ...
- Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:59 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 670
- Views: 976768
Re: Encryption
The DC ATSC 3 stations seem to have ruined the reception of ABC 7.1 for me.
odds are you have a local noise interference issue impacting VHF reception.
@cncb,
If you are close enough to the low power WDCN 3.0 transmitter in Merrifield, VA, the local interference could be a WDCN second ...
- Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:16 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 670
- Views: 976768
Re: Encryption
Do you see a possible scenario where we might lose read/edit/whatever-I-want access to recordings of unencrypted ATSC 3.0 channels?
Seems highly unlikely. I have no idea why anyone would be doing that.
Please see https://www.avsforum.com/threads/adth-atsc-3-0-tuner-thread.3283967/page-29 ...
- Mon Jan 29, 2024 9:26 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 670
- Views: 976768
Re: Encryption
This.
So again I ask: what is the point of DRM certification if it doesn't guarantee that HDHR users can at least view DRM-encrypted channels live?
Unless you plan to add HDMI outputs or provide dongles as @DSperber suggests, I don't see the point.
(Note also that insofar as SD is at the ...
- Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:19 am
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: Encryption
- Replies: 670
- Views: 976768
Re: Encryption
“We plan to offer broadcasters the ability to block the user from viewing the channel via their home network.”
This is the current situation, mission accomplished! If I can’t view it, none of the rest even matters.Why waste the electrons?
Thank you for noticing! I've been wondering how long ...
- Tue Sep 12, 2023 10:43 pm
- Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
- Topic: HDHomeRun 4K is Nextgen TV Certified
- Replies: 216
- Views: 826354
Re: HDHomeRun 4K is Nextgen TV Certified
Not good enough. That box also needs a standard NTSC output for those still using CECBs.gtb wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 8:01 pm What the broadcasters have been recently pushing is the FCC subsidizes a cheap box that converts ATSC 3.0 to a HDMI output to support existing ATSC 1.0 only TV's and then everyone can go ATSC 3.0.