Search found 10 matches

by joblo
Thu Sep 19, 2024 5:54 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Encryption
Replies: 670
Views: 976768

Re: Encryption

hancox wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 3:18 am Not that a "strongly worded letter" is usually a good sign
I agree.
by joblo
Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:03 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Encryption
Replies: 670
Views: 976768

Re: What will it look like?


If the powers that be approve SD decryption, I suspect the requirements will be to refuse skipping or fast forwarding content (the commercials will need to be included just like the streaming apps) and anyone using HDHomeRUN ATSC 3 decrypted streams must also abide by the rules. Correct?


Mon ...
by joblo
Fri Aug 23, 2024 7:33 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Encryption
Replies: 670
Views: 976768

Re: Encryption

[withdrawn by author]
by joblo
Wed May 01, 2024 10:48 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Encryption
Replies: 670
Views: 976768

Re: Encryption

nickk wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 10:40 am every new feature an innovator wants to add to a consumer product needs to be approved by the broadcasters that are on the A3SA voting committee.
Which broadcasters are on the A3SA voting committee?
by joblo
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:32 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Encryption
Replies: 670
Views: 976768

Re: Encryption


according to [an SD competitor] 15.1 and 61.1 in phoenix (115.1/161.1 for SD's tuners) [...] are marked in a way that either offline mode is required (something a gateway will probably never have, but tv's can do but don't always use when connected) or interactive apps must be supported... since ...
by joblo
Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:59 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Encryption
Replies: 670
Views: 976768

Re: Encryption


The DC ATSC 3 stations seem to have ruined the reception of ABC 7.1 for me.

odds are you have a local noise interference issue impacting VHF reception.
@cncb,

If you are close enough to the low power WDCN 3.0 transmitter in Merrifield, VA, the local interference could be a WDCN second ...
by joblo
Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:16 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Encryption
Replies: 670
Views: 976768

Re: Encryption



Do you see a possible scenario where we might lose read/edit/whatever-I-want access to recordings of unencrypted ATSC 3.0 channels?


Seems highly unlikely. I have no idea why anyone would be doing that.
Please see https://www.avsforum.com/threads/adth-atsc-3-0-tuner-thread.3283967/page-29 ...
by joblo
Mon Jan 29, 2024 9:26 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Encryption
Replies: 670
Views: 976768

Re: Encryption


This.


So again I ask: what is the point of DRM certification if it doesn't guarantee that HDHR users can at least view DRM-encrypted channels live?

Unless you plan to add HDMI outputs or provide dongles as @DSperber suggests, I don't see the point.

(Note also that insofar as SD is at the ...
by joblo
Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:19 am
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: Encryption
Replies: 670
Views: 976768

Re: Encryption


“We plan to offer broadcasters the ability to block the user from viewing the channel via their home network.”


This is the current situation, mission accomplished! If I can’t view it, none of the rest even matters.Why waste the electrons?
Thank you for noticing! I've been wondering how long ...
by joblo
Tue Sep 12, 2023 10:43 pm
Forum: ATSC 3.0 Forum
Topic: HDHomeRun 4K is Nextgen TV Certified
Replies: 216
Views: 826354

Re: HDHomeRun 4K is Nextgen TV Certified

gtb wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 8:01 pm What the broadcasters have been recently pushing is the FCC subsidizes a cheap box that converts ATSC 3.0 to a HDMI output to support existing ATSC 1.0 only TV's and then everyone can go ATSC 3.0.
Not good enough. That box also needs a standard NTSC output for those still using CECBs.