Search found 5 matches

by plnota
Sat Jan 18, 2020 9:42 pm
Forum: Future Product Discussion
Topic: atsc 3.0
Replies: 25
Views: 4055

Re: atsc 3.0

Yup just form what I under it has build-in 2 way communication so it only need gain access to broadcasts tower or internet for that part of authorizations which I'm sure it will have some kind build in SIM-type based solutions know as SoC system-on-a-chip which req possible a close by cell tower to...
by plnota
Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:21 pm
Forum: Future Product Discussion
Topic: atsc 3.0
Replies: 25
Views: 4055

Re: atsc 3.0

Even with regular ATSC, some broadcasters have been transmitting encrypted sub channels. I have picked them up occasionally with a high subchannel number - like 67.27 and such. I don't know for sure, but I would expect that the station must at least have the main channel free and clear. It stands t...
by plnota
Sun Jan 12, 2020 4:55 pm
Forum: Future Product Discussion
Topic: atsc 3.0
Replies: 25
Views: 4055

Re: atsc 3.0

If you really want an ATSC3 tuner to play with, there is one available on https://redzonereceiver.tv/shop $900 for the Linux kit, which doesn't mention any sort of included player to view the broadcasts (just stats?). The $2000 Windows kit comes with software to watch broadcasts, but $2000... :? Ho...
by plnota
Fri Jan 10, 2020 8:33 pm
Forum: Future Product Discussion
Topic: atsc 3.0
Replies: 25
Views: 4055

Re: atsc 3.0

I like the enthusiasm but you might want to look at a recent youtube report by Antenna Man on his experience with testing 3.0 broadcast from a testing center. Do look at the current prices he lists on the available 3.0 tuners and the dongle needed for authorizing other channels that are broadcast [...
by plnota
Thu Jan 09, 2020 6:26 pm
Forum: Future Product Discussion
Topic: atsc 3.0
Replies: 25
Views: 4055

Re: atsc 3.0

I'm located in Dallas, and we've had a station broadcasting in 3.0 for about 6 months (KSTR, 4 transmitters in a SFN). Would really like to see a 3.0-compatible HDHR made available soon.